Welcome to the Long Term Care Review.

Through this blog I will try to keep you updated on the most important news and changes in the field of long term care as it happens.

Long term care is such an important and vital subject that affects us all in one way or another, and the next few years promise to bring significant challenges in this field as the senior population expands rapidly.

So be sure to check back here regularly or just grab our blog feed to stay current with the most important changes as they take place.

And be sure to visit my website for even more information and articles on long term care issues.

Get Free Long Term Care Insurance Quotes Here

Helping provide long-term care insurance in over 30 states nationwide!




Long-Term Care Insurance and Geriatric Care Managers

I am often asked about the procedure for getting a claim in process when long-term care becomes necessary. It’s natural to be concerned about this since no one wants to have to go through a hassle to get quality care and make sure that the insurance company is fully on board with the choices they make.

The good news is that several of the top-rated carriers have provisions in their policy to bring in a Care Manager to help with this very important stage. They will assist in helping you fill out the appropriate forms for the insurance company and then help draw up a plan of care that will be in line with the wishes of the policyholder and the medical advice of their doctor. They can even help get everything in motion by making the arrangements for you if you are too ill to do so.

Unfortunately, many people have never heard of Geriatric Care Managers and have no idea about what they do. Here is an article that helps explain more about them:

“About 44 million Americans look after adult family members – an especially daunting task for adult children who live in another state or who have demanding jobs or their own children – according to the Family Caregiver Alliance. And that number is expected to double by 2050.

That’s where geriatric care managers such as Ms. Paggi come in. While they don’t typically provide hands-on care, they help families hire and supervise in-home caregivers or shop for a senior-living community.

Mike Tankersley has called on Ms. Paggi twice in six years, first to evaluate nursing homes for his mother-in-law and more recently to help his mother move from Austin to a senior community in Dallas.

“There are so many communities, we couldn’t have done it on our own,” he said.

A crisis often prompts the initial call to a care manager. A parent falls and breaks a hip, or the children notice that their mother doesn’t remember a conversation from just minutes ago.

In those cases, Dallas care manager Molly Shomer said, she usually starts by sitting down with the family and determining the older person’s physical, mental and social needs. She drafts a plan for care and, if the family agrees, coordinates it.

“Some families may think Mom is ready for a nursing home, but maybe all she needs is a daytime companion,” Ms. Shomer said. “Other times, her continuing to live at home may be isolating or dangerous. It all depends on the person.” ”

You can read the rest of the article here.

Life Expectancy and Long-Term Care

One of the main reasons long-term care issues are becoming more critical in the US is the increasing life expectancy rates for the population in general. In short, we are simply living longer because we are surviving many of the diseases that were killing us at earlier ages, and the diseases that increase the likelihood of needing long-term care are on the rise.

This means that although we live longer we need more care in the final stages of life. The National Center for Health Statistics just released new data that illustrates the decline in age-related deaths due to certain common diseases. Here are the findings:

  • Between 2005 and 2006, the largest decline in age-adjusted death rates occurred for influenza and pneumonia, with a 12.8 percent decline. Other declines were observed for chronic lower respiratory diseases (6.5 percent), stroke (6.4 percent), heart disease (5.5 percent), diabetes (5.3 percent), hypertension (5 percent), chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (3.3 percent), suicide (2.8 percent), septicemia or blood poisoning (2.7 percent), cancer (1.6 percent) and accidents (1.5 percent).

Here are the findings for life exspectancy:

  • Life expectancy at birth hit a new record high in 2006 of 78.1 years, a 0.3 increase from 2005. Record high life expectancy was recorded for both white males and black males (76 years and 70 years, respectively) as well as for white females and black females (81 years and 76.9 years).

Unfortunately Alzheimer’s is still growing as expected and is moving up the list of the leading cause of death. Here is what they found:

  • Alzheimer’s disease passed diabetes to become the sixth leading cause of death in the United States in 2006. An estimated 72,914 Americans died of Alzheimer’s disease in 2006. However, the preliminary age-adjusted death rate from Alzheimer’s did not change significantly between 2005 and 2006.

These statistics give even more reason to plan ahead for our long-term care needs with LTCI.

What You Should Know About Long-Term Care Insurance Premiums – Part 2

In an earlier blog post I discussed the possibility of LTCI premium increases due to selecting an inflation protection option that is not automatic at the inception of the policy. In this article I will explain how policyholders could face future rate increases due to factors that are beyond their control.

When a policy design includes automatic inflation protection the premiums are designed to stay level for life. This is because all future benefit increases are already built into the premium. So benefits continue to rise each year to offset the cost of inflation but the premiums remain the same.

However, all insurance carriers are required to inform applicants for new LTCI policies that they reserve the right to be able to raise LTCI premiums in the future if it becomes necessary. This is because long-term care has proven to be a constantly changing field in the past 30 years and this presents a significant challenge for insurers to be able to accurately predict future costs in this industry.

There are many other forms of commonly purchased insurance such as life, homeowners, and even auto insurance, These all have reliable and stable data that goes back many years and therefore most insurance carriers are able to accurately predict future costs fairly easily.

On the other hand the ever-changing nature of long-term care presents unique challenges for most insurers and several very good companies have come into this industry in the past and eventually had to cease their LTCI sales or even leave the field altogether. This often means that their policyholders will face rate increases to offset the unforeseen costs that were not built into their premium at the inception of the policy.

Sometimes, these increases may be fairly minor. But in some cases policyholders may face rate increases of 50% – 70% or even more. Of course, this can be a serious problem for owners of these policies who are on a fixed income.

So how does a consumer try to minimize the chances of facing these kind of premium increases in the future?

It is usually best to choose from the major carriers who have been in this field for a long time and have demonstrated solid rate and financial stability. This shows that these carriers have weathered the challenges and problems that are unique to long-term care insurance. It also shows that they employ high quality business practices and underwriting procedures that will most likely make them reliable for many years to come.

Since long-term care insurance has only been available for the last 30 years or so, there are not a lot of companies that can boast of having a stable premium record for the last 20 years or more. But choosing from the short list of highly respected LTCI carriers who have such excellent track records can help protect against significant premium increases in the future.

Risk Of Needing Care Rises After Death Of Spouse

It’s no secret that in many cases a person’s health will be better overall when they are married and have someone else around for company. Many studies over the years have found this to be true.

In fact, some long-term care insurers place such a high value on married couples that is even reflected in their premium calculations. These companies have greatly biased premiums in favor of those who are married as opposed to a single individual.

So it only makes sense to find out that once a spouse deceases the other may be especially susceptable to needing long-term care. Here is an article that discusses a study that corroborates this:

“An older person’s likelihood of entering a nursing home or other long-term care facility is particularly high immediately after the death of a spouse, new research indicates.

There could be various reasons for this, Elina Nihtila, of the department of sociology at the University of Helsinki, Finland, who led the research, told Reuters Health.

“It may be related to the loss of social and instrumental support, in the form of care and help with daily activities such as help in cooking, cleaning, and shopping formerly shared with the deceased spouse,” Nihtila said.

“Second, grief and spousal loss may cause various symptoms, such as depression and anxiety, loss of appetite, sleep disturbances, fatigue and loss of concentration that could increase the need for institutional care.” She added. “Furthermore, grief may cause increased susceptibility to physical diseases.”

The research team analyzed how the death of a spouse affects the likelihood of entering institutionalized care among nearly 141,000 Finnish adults aged 65 and older. All of them were living with a spouse at the beginning of the study and were followed for five years.”

You can read the rest of the article here.

Relying On Medicaid For Long-Term Care Can Be Risky

I’m constantly surprised by the numbers of people I talk to about LTCI who have the assets to comfortably pay for a policy but who ultimately decide to take their chances with the Medicaid system if they exhaust their assets and still need care.

This mentality of reliance on government programs to bail people out of tough financial situations may have worked in the past, but there are ever increasing signs that it will be very risky business in the future.

We are already starting to see many facilities who decline participating in the Medicaid program altogether due to the fact that funds provided for Medicaid patients are often less than what is needed for providing their care. And this is before the baby boomer generation begins to retire and place an even greater strain on the Medicaid coffers in the years ahead.

For those who complain that LTCI premiums are so expensive, my response is “Try paying for the care itself”. Here is an excerpt from an article about how many facilities are actually evicting patients when they become Medicaid eligible:

“Evictions of Medicaid residents from assisted-living centers has become a growing problem across the state, elder care experts say. The state Long-Term Care Ombudsman’s office received 200 complaints last year surrounding involuntary discharges from long-term care centers.

About 75 were specifically related to facilities canceling their Medicaid contracts with the state or reducing the number of beds available to low-income tenants.

Although residents get help finding a new place to live — typically a group home or skilled nursing center — moving can cause “transfer trauma,” leaving the elderly and disabled to think they did something wrong, according to Louise Ryan, the state’s long-term care ombudsman.

Laurie Bebo, chief executive of Assisted Living Concepts, the Wisconsin company that owns Blossom House, said residents are prepared well in advance for a move in order to minimize disruption.

“We have always found appropriate placement for people,” Bebo said.

Companies like ALC that oper-ate assisted-living centers blame low Medicaid reimbursement rates, which in the state of Washington rose just under one percent last year. Such centers, which cater to people who are relatively self-sufficient, lose $20 to $30 a day on each Medicaid resident, according to the Department of Social and Health Services.

Gary Weeks, executive director of the Washington Health Care Association, said this is an unsustainable business model.

“You can’t run a business losing money on every resident on Medicaid and keep charging private-pay patients more and more,” Weeks said.

“What happens is the private-pay folks spend their resources down and become Medicaid-eligible themselves. It’s a cycle we can’t seem to find our way out of.” ”

You can read the rest of the article here.

Fidelity Investments Weighs In On The Cost Of Long-Term Care

Many people I talk to that are in the process of investigating LTCI are actually just looking for a way to justify not getting it if they possibly can. Of course, no one wants to spend money that they don’t have to.

But the evidence that LTCI is a very important part of a successful retirement plan for people with assets to protect is becoming overwhelming. Many popular financial authors, periodicals and magazines are regularly warning about the need to protect against the huge financial risks posed by long-term care.

One recent addition to this accumulating mound of evidence is a press release from Fidelity Investments, one of the largest mutual fund and investment firms in the US. Here is an excerpt:

“In just 10 years, approximately 50 million Americans will be over the age of 65. More than half of these individuals will require
at least one year of long-term care, and 20 percent will require more than five years of care before they die(2). With the average cost of a one-year stay in a private room in a nursing home estimated at more than $76,000(3), not preparing for these potential costs can result in personal and financial burdens for family members.

In fact, between 75 and 80 percent of all long-term care given in the United States is provided by a family member(4). New Fidelity research finds that currently there are 29 million Americans providing informal long-term care to family members, and spending an average 34 hours per week providing this care(5), nearly equivalent to a full work week.

“With the cost of certain long-term care services rising by as much as 7% per year for the last 5 years(3), retirees who don’t factor these future potential costs into their overall retirement plan, may be surprised by the financial impact on themselves or their family members,” said Joan Bloom, senior vice president, Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company.

To illustrate the potential financial burden, Fidelity estimates that a 50-year old Baby Boomer, who is earning $50,000 annually, and ends-up providing a total of four years of long-term care to a family member, could lose more than $140,000 in wages, retirement plans, and social security over his or her lifetime(6).

“Having helped more than 100,000 caregiving families, we have found that in addition to the financial impact, these caregivers also experience great emotional and physical tolls,” said Kathleen Kelly, executive director of Family Caregiver Alliance. “For example, often those providing long-term care to a family member develop health issues of their own, and more than half report suffering from depression. Saving for and insuring against long-term care costs, and exploring community resources and organizations that may offer free or low-cost services, can help minimize the family caregiver burden.”

Long-term care insurance benefits go beyond asset protection — insured individuals may also benefit from increased choice in the location and quality of care. And, according to a Fidelity study about retiree well-being(7), 36 percent of retirees who describe themselves as happy, state that having long-term care insurance is a major contributor to their happiness and peace of mind. ”



Fidelity also provides several recommendations and tips for purchasing LTCI and I agree with the vast majority of their conclusions. You can read the rest of the press release here.

What You Should Know About Long-Term Care Insurance Premiums

Affordability is a very important ingredient in any successful long-term care plan. That is why the premium cost is often the most important factor in the minds of consumers that are considering the purchase of LTCI.

One of the most commonly asked questions that I receive is “Will my premiums ever increase?” The answer is that there are a couple of scenarios where LTCI premiums could increase and I will try to explain one in this article and follow up with the second in a future article.

The first scenario has to do with a choice the policyholder makes regarding inflation protection. Most LTCI policies have automatic inflation protection built into the policy design from the beginning and in such cases the premium is designed to stay level for the rest of the life of the policyholder. The benefits always increase each year but the premium remains the same.

Some insurance carriers offer a different kind of inflation protection where the policyholder starts out with no automatic inflation protection and instead benefit increases will be offered every three years or so. These increases can usually be accepted or declined by the policyholder. This means that your premium will be increasing every three years for the rest of your life or until you start receiving policy benefits.

The problem with this inflation protection choice is that the policyholder is three years older when each offer of extra benefits is made and the cost of the added benefits is based on the later age, not on the age of the policyholder at the inception of the policy. This can result in a large increase in premiums in later years and some consumers simply drop these policies after a while since they just can’t afford to continue paying premiums that are so much higher than their original premium cost.

Group policies often offer this kind of inflation protection to stay competitive with individual LTCI policies. It is very important for consumers to understand the long-term effects these kind of premium increases can have before finalizing their decision. Unfortunately, I often see many policyholders that did not understand the ramifications of this kind of inflation protection when they purchased the policy. They sometimes find themselves locked into a policy that is constantly increasing in price and have few options for switching to a more affordable LTCI product because of their age and/or health circumstances.

It is true that automatic inflation protection increases that are built into the premium cost from the inception of the policy will initially be more expensive than a periodic increase offer. But in my opinion, in most circumstances, it is better to lock in your inflation protection costs at an early age, and know that your premiums will remain stable, than take the chance on an ever-increasing premium that may eventually be too much to afford.

The Financial Impact Of Dealing With the Cost of Alzheimer’s

There are many reasons why long-term care may become necessary, but one of the most difficult both financially and emotionally is due to Alzheimer’s. Since the body can remain relatively healthy for a period of time while the cognitive abilities deteriorate, no one knows how long this kind of care may last.

During the care process the family of the one of the receiving care will have a unique set of challenges to deal with. Here is an article from the Wall Street Journal that discusses the impact that dealing with Alzheimer’s can have from a financial standpoint:

“When Theresa Kraus’s mother was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 2005 at age 87, Ms. Kraus figured that she could manage the health-care bills if she combined her mother’s savings and her own. But the size of those bills proved larger than anyone anticipated.

To start, the mother moved in with Ms. Kraus, who had to pay for care almost 24 hours a day, seven days a week. An extra person in the house meant higher costs for food and utilities. Additional expenses — including medicine, co-payments for doctors’ visits and adult diapers — amounted to $200 to $300 a month.

By the time her mother passed away in March, Ms. Kraus had run through her mother’s savings — as well as the money that Ms. Kraus had put aside for her daughter’s college education. Ms. Kraus, a teacher in Rochester, N.Y., is now tens of thousands of dollars in debt. She says she doesn’t regret a penny of the money spent, but adds that the impact on her finances was devastating.

“You never think you are going to outspend the money you [have] saved,” she says.

An Alzheimer’s diagnosis is the start of a long, hard road. Naturally, health-care questions must be resolved, but at the same time, families need to address a host of financial issues. They range from the logistical — tracking down deeds or making sure family members have access to bank and savings accounts — to budgeting and assessing the potential costs of care.

“These are conversations that need to be had early and often,” says Donna Schempp, program director for the California-based Family Caregiver Alliance.

Patients Participate

Tackling tough questions at the outset can give Alzheimer’s patients the chance to express their wishes, which can go a long way toward avoiding family disputes down the road.

“People in the early stage of the disease, no matter how old, can still retain a lot of abilities and be able to participate in their own planning,” says Peter Reed, senior director of programs for the Alzheimer’s Association.

Legal issues, such as determining who will have power of attorney once the person is no longer able to make decisions, should be a top priority. Says Marguerite Angelari, an elder-care law professor at Loyola University Chicago School of Law: “Decision-making capacity is going to start to decline…and, if needed, you want to be able to have someone step in immediately.”

If the person with Alzheimer’s lives on his or her own, household bills should be sent to someone else, and others should have the ability to monitor spending. “Sometimes when people are in the early stages of dementia they spend money inappropriately or build up unpaid bills because they aren’t able to keep track,” Ms. Angelari says.

Outlining a potential budget can help avoid unpleasant surprises later.

If there’s a long-term-care insurance policy, review details of the coverage. And as daunting as it seems, when considering questions about home care and nursing homes, talk to an expert on your state’s Medicaid to understand eligibility rules.

That kind of help can sometimes be found at a state agency on aging, in the office of an elder-law attorney, or with an organization such as the Alzheimer’s Association, which has staff members who also offer help on setting up a budget.

Central to financial planning will be decisions about where the care will take place, such as an assisted-living facility, nursing home or in a family home. Continuing-care retirement communities have grown in popularity, but they generally require a large initial investment. Adult day care is more common, but also comes with a cost.

Paying Family Members

Some family members will want to help provide care. For those thinking about quitting a job or working part time, be sure to weigh the costs beyond losing a salary. Such a move will cut into retirement savings and Social Security, not to mention potentially lead to the loss of medical insurance.

One increasingly popular option is to have a family member act as a paid caregiver. But that approach is more complicated than just writing a check; if you end up applying for Medicaid, such payments could be viewed as transfers of assets, which could delay eligibility. The solution is to have a so-called personal-care contract put in place, which specifies the care being provided and the pay.

“You want to formalize it as much as possible,” says Loyola’s Ms. Angelari. “And you want to work with an attorney that doesn’t just know the state law; you want one that knows what’s going to be acceptable to the Medicaid office.”

Then, as Ms. Kraus found out with her mother, expenses pop up unexpectedly. In addition to adult diapers, many people with advanced Alzheimer’s may need costly liquid nutritional supplements. If there are physical impairments as well, home modifications may be needed.”

Read more of this article here.

Pennsylvania “Own Your Future” Campaign A Huge Success

Several states have joined with the federal government in an initiative to get the word out about the need for long-term care planning. Both state and federal government agencies understand that without some advance planning and taking responsibility for their own care now, the prospect of providing quality long-term care for baby boomers is going to be very difficult at best.

Pennsylvania is one of the most recent states to promote a statewide advertising campaign aimed at those who will most likely need to begin planning for long-term care costs soon. Pennsylvania has also chosen to enact the Partnership program that I have discussed at great length in this blog in other posts as well.

Here is an article that discusses the great interest that the “Own Your Future” advertising campaign had among Pennsylvania residents:

“Governor Edward G. Rendell said today that more than 200,000 people have requested Own Your Future planning kits since March, when Pennsylvania launched its outreach effort urging individuals to take a more active role in planning their own long-term care needs.

The federal government says Pennsylvania’s 13 percent response rate is approximately double the rate seen by any of the 16 states that took part in similar outreach efforts. The typical response rate reported by states is between 5 and 7 percent.

“The strong response to our Own Your Future campaign suggests that Pennsylvanians are seriously considering their future long-term living needs,” Governor Rendell said. “Individuals who begin planning today will have a broader range of options available to them in their later years, which can help to ensure greater financial security and peace of mind.”

By 2020, one in four Pennsylvanians will be age 60 or older. Many consumers are not aware that Medicare does not cover the cost of many long-term care services.

More than 1.6 million Pennsylvania households with residents aged 45 to 65 received a letter from Governor Rendell urging them to request the Own Your Future kit, which offers information on financial planning, legal services, housing, transportation, long-term care insurance and more. ”

You can read more of this article here.

2008 Long-Term Care Insurance Price Index Rate Increase

The American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance often publishes a yearly Price Index to help track the increasing costs of long-term care from year to year. The 2008 edition of the Price Index has been released and these are the findings:

A 55-year-old individual considering long-term care insurance protection can expect to pay $709-per-year for a base level of protection if they are married or $1,095 if they are single according to the 2008 Long-Term Care Insurance Price Index. Costs for coverage increased about 4% over 2007.

The annual index measures current costs for top-selling long-term care insurance policies that offer consumers approximately $115,000 in current benefits (base-level coverage), with protection increasing yearly as the individual ages.

2008 National LTCi Price Index

Average price for a comprehensive long-term care insurance policy (100% home care benefit + skilled care coverage) 90-Day Elimination Period with 5% Compound Inflation Protection Option

  • Age 55 $100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $709-per-year Individual Qualifies for Preferred Health and Spousal Discounts
  • Age 55 $100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $1,095-per-year Individual is single (preferred health discount)
  • Age 55 $150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $1,064-per-year Individual Qualifies for Preferred Health and Spousal Discounts
  • Age 55 150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $1,578-per-year Individual is single (preferred health discount)

  • Age 65 $100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $1,342-per-year Individual Qualifies for Spousal Discounts (standard health)
  • Age 65 $100 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $1,999-per-year Individual is single (standard health)
  • Age 65 $150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $2,013-per-year Individual Qualifies for Spousal Discounts (standard health)
  • Age 65 $150 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $2,998-per-year Individual is single (standard health)

  • Age 65 $240 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $3,221-per-year Individual Qualifies for Spousal Discounts (standard health)
  • Age 65 $240 Maximum Daily Benefit x 3 Year Benefit Period
    Cost: $4,729-per-year Individual is single (standard health

Genworth Reports Care Gap in LTC Workers

Genworth reports that the number of LTC workers in the U.S. is dwindling while demand is growing and the “Care Gap” threatens to increase the already high cost of home care.

The country is challenged with recruiting 200,000 new home health care workers each year and retaining them to meet the needs of the nation’s burgeoning senior population. Can it be done? Read the executive summary of the Genworth white paper A Workforce to Care for Our Aging to review the startling statistics and the consequences of the possible labor shortage.

You can read the report here.

Kiplingers Discusses Lower Cost LTCI Policies

Kiplingers Personal Finance magazine often publishes articles on long-term care issues to help keep their readers up on the latest trends in the industry and how they would be affected financially.

A recent article focuses on some of the lower cost policies that are now being offered by some of the largest and most established carriers including Genworth, John Hancock and MetLife.

I certainly think that these policies have a place for some folks who simply can’t afford more coverage and for those who can co-insure a significant portion of their own LTC costs.

However, each of these new lower cost policies also have their drawbacks too. It’s a good idea to read about them and I will be happy to discuss the pros and cons with anyone who would like to know more.

In the meantime, here is the article to review.

John Hancock Announces Policy Enhancements

On June 23, 2008, Custom Care II will become Custom Care II Enhanced in approved states. There are three main areas of benefit enhancement and they are:

Caregiver Support Services

• Provides policyholders and their families with access to provider discounts, care provider quality
reports and expert advice when they are called on to be caregivers or care planners for aging parents,
a spouse, partners, children, and relatives.

• Coupled with the Double Coverage for Accidents benefit and Return of Premium before 65 benefit,
Caregiver Support Services gives Custom Care II Enhanced the strongest package of built-in “boomeroriented”
benefits on the market today.

Unlimited CPI Compound Inflation

• Provides a more affordable compound inflation option that links annual benefit increases to changes in
the Consumer Price Index (CPI); includes an additional Guaranteed Increase Option (GIO) that
enables clients to also increase coverage by 10% every 3 years with no underwriting.

• CPI Compound Inflation gives greater flexibility to offer Custom Care II Enhanced coverage to a
wider array of clients — at multiple price points.

Consumer Protection Provisions

• Designed to give clients the reassurance they need at time of purchase and at time of claim; includes
provisions such as:

o Alternate Services Benefit for emerging care services

o Independent Third-Party Review option

o Lifestyle Benefit Changes to adjust policy coverage when needs change

Accompanying these enhancements will be a minor premium adjustment of about 4% on average, on new
business rates in approved states.

How To Identify A Partnership-Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance Policy

In previous blog articles I have discussed the long-term care insurance partnership program that almost two thirds of the states have either already put in place or are in the process of approving for their residents.

This program is designed to encourage the purchase of LTCI by consumers so that the state can reduce its liability for paying for long-term care costs in the future. This is vital if current state Medicaid programs are going to remain solvent. The advantage to the consumer is that the state acts as a safety net for them in case their care exceeds the benefits of their LTCI policy, and they are guaranteed that long term care costs will not be allowed to completely wipe out all of their assets.

But what identifies a policy as being partnership-qualified?

There are several qualifications that were outlined in the federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, including the need to be federally tax-qualified and to contain the consumer protection provisions of the NAIC LTCI Model Act and Model Regulation. The vast majority of policies sold today already have those provisions anyway.

There is one requirement that contributes more than almost any other to qualifying a LTCI policy for the partnership program though. It must have the age appropriate inflation protection benefit.

These requirements are as follows:

 Those age 60 or younger must have “compound annual inflation protection.”

 Those at least 61 but younger than 76 must have “some level of inflation protection.”

 Those age 76 or older must be offered an inflation protection option, but they are not required to purchase that option.

It is a fair question to ask why inflation protection is given such prominence in partnership-qualified policies? The answer is that if partnership-qualified policies don’t have inflation protection, the purpose of a partnership program may be defeated.

This is because the whole purpose of the partnership program is to help relieve the financial burden of long-term care costs from the state Medicaid systems. If a consumer buys a LTCI policy but does not allow it to keep pace with the rising costs of care, the insufficient benefits will be more likely to force the policyholder to turn to Medicaid anyway. With very little assets left the state will have to pick up the rest of the bill for this individual and the original intent of the program is defeated.

A very important lesson that can be learned is that inflation protection is a vital component of any LTCI policy whether partnership-qualified or not.

Nursing Home, Assisted Living Costs Increase for Fifth Consecutive Year

Costs for nursing homes and assisted living centers rose again from 2007 to 2008, making this the fifth consecutive year of price increases, according to results from Genworth’s latest Cost of Care Survey.

Costs for nursing homes have jumped 17 percent since 2004 and now average $76,460 annually or $209 per day for a private room. Assisted living charges escalated even more during the same period, rising 25 percent to average $36,090 nationally.

In contrast, in-home care costs for non-Medicare certified workers have remained relatively stable since 2004 and continue to average $18/hour for homemaker services and $19/hour for a home health aide. The cost of a Medicare-certified aide, however, has changed, rising 7 percent over the past four years to reach $38/hour on average in 2008.

For the first time, the survey looked at adult day health care. The annual cost for five-day-a week participation in a community-based care setting is $15,000, with an average daily price of $59.

The study speculates that costs will rise further if the shortage of long-term care workers continues.

Long-term care costs can vary significantly by locale. For cost information by state or metropolitan area, visit www.genworth.com/costofcare. You can also read the full report and a description of the research methodology used.

How To Cut Long-Term Care Insurance Costs

Affordability is a very important ingredient in any successful long-term care plan. As is the case with many kinds of insurance, there is a need to determine an appropriate coverage level that not only provides sufficient financial protection but also allows the policyholder to continue to keep the coverage in place and afford paying the necessary premiums for as long as the insurance is needed.

Of course, we all would like to have the ultimate in financial asset protection that is available. But for the vast majority of people that would be out of reach financially and in fact, would be far too much than is needed in most cases.

CNNMoney.com published an article that makes suggestions on how to trim costs in a long-term care insurance policy to keep the premiums affordable and still provide good coverage at the same time. Here is an excerpt from that article:

“And three years is often enough. “Among people over 65 who are in nursing homes, half will leave within three months,” Miccolis said.

For the other half, the average stay is 21/2 years.

But people with dementia, for instance, tend to stay longer. So you might want to get more coverage if that’s in your family history.

A policy providing benefits for, say, five or 10 years costs more than a three-year policy. But it would still be cheaper than lifetime coverage.

Another way to save costs is to change the formula for inflation adjustments. You can choose simple rather than compound increases.

Say Jones picks a 5% simple inflation adjustment. Her $200 daily benefit would go up $10 a day each year. Jones would have a $340 daily benefit after 14 years.

A 5% simple cost of living allowance (COLA) would cut the premium on the top-of-the-line policy from $7,000 to $4,500 a year.

Miccolis says that a simple COLA might work best for people 70 or older. Odds are that they have fewer years for the gap between a simple and a compound COLA to cost a lot.

In your 50s, a compound COLA might make sense. And you can cut costs by taking a lower daily benefit to start with.

Some LTC policies offer a so-called future purchase option. That gives you a chance to buy extra coverage every two or three years, without taking a physical exam.

Yet another budget move is to take a longer elimination period. You might choose a 90-day rather than a 30-day wait for benefits.

That’s like taking a higher deductible for regular medical. You might pay more for any needed care before the coverage kicks in.

But you’ll pay lower yearly premiums. Taking a 90-day elimination period instead of a 30-day cuts the cost of a $7,000 top-of-the-line policy to around $5,750.

And you don’t have to limit yourself to one cost-cutter. Say Jones uses all the above suggestions. She buys a $200 daily benefit, three years of coverage, a simple COLA and a 90-day elimination period.

Instead of $7,000 a year for a top-of-the-line policy, her annual premium would be less than $2,000.

And Jones may decide that she doesn’t really need to start with a $200 daily benefit. That depends on where she might need care.”

You can read the rest of the article here.

Smart Money Magazine and Long-Term Care

More and more major periodicals and newspapers are starting to get the word out about the benefits of long-term care insurance. This is especially true of most financially-related media.

There are too many journalists who succumb to sensationalistic writing and tend to focus the bulk of their attention on LTCI companies that have a less than stellar record of service in the past. This would still be fine if they would also contrast that situation with the major carriers who have had outstanding financial and customer service ratings for many years. Unfortunately, they often only provide one side of the story in an effort to titillate their readers and stir up controversy.

Next month, Smart Money magazine will publish an excellent article on LTCI that is both balanced and very informative. I agree with the vast majority of information in it and here is a link to an advance copy of that article that I think my readers will find very useful: Smart Money Long-Term Care Insurance Article

Who Will Look After You When You Need Care?

Terry Savage is a personal finanace writer for the Chicago Sun-Times and she wrote an article that was published on March 31 that I just had to include in my blog for the benefit of all of my readers.

She rightly draws the attention to the inability of government programs to provide adequate care even now and asks us to consider what that scenario is going to look like in 15 - 30 years down the line. Here is an excerpt from her article:

Don’t say you weren’t warned. The long-term care crisis is upon us. The rumblings have already started in small towns around the country. The government is already having trouble paying the cost of long-term care for the indigent elderly.

Recently, the Wall Street Journal wrote a front-page article, slamming states for joining in a partnership to
encourage the purchase of long-term care insurance to offset the rising strain on their budgets. The article cited concerns about rising policy premiums and difficulty collecting benefits from some insurers.

Well, those are issues that can be addressed with regulation. The very real concern about the cost burden to
government didn’t make the headlines in the Wall Street Journal. But it did make headlines the very same week in the East Troy, Wis., newspaper: “Local Nursing Home Launches ‘Save the Manor’ Campaign.”

The 30-year-old Kiwanis Manor nursing home there is “looking for the community’s help to financially keep it afloat” says the article. The well-regarded, AAA-rated facility has “at least $400,000 in bills greater than its
accounts receivable.”

Bad planning? Maybe. But it appears the big issue is a cutback in government reimbursements. In 2006, Medicaid payments for these residents was about $25 a day less than the cost of providing services, the article said, adding that in 2007, the reimbursement was cut by $3 a day.

Even more burdensome, explains the article, the state demanded the nursing home add one certified nursing assistant to every shift — an additional payroll cost of more than $100,000 a year — while at the same time cutting its reimbursements to the nursing home by $40,000 a year! And the baby boomers haven’t even started retiring yet!

Another headline from a small-town Wisconsin paper, The Week, said: “Resolution asks county to stop reducing the number of beds for Medicaid patients.” “To save taxpayer dollars, the county has gradually
increased the number of beds available for patients who can pay privately,” the paper reported, ” . . . and that
means fewer beds are available for indigent patients covered by government-subsidized Medicaid.”

Now, are you still counting on the government to pay for your long-term care? Think again.

You can download a reprint of the entire article here.

The Most Common and Expensive Long-Term Care Insurance Mistake

There are many mistakes that can be made when considering long-term care insurance, and some of them can be very costly.

Some of the most common mistakes include only getting quotes from one company, assuming knowledge of long-term care costs when no real research has been done, relying on someone else’s opinion of what policy design is best for your circumstances, and so on.

All of these mistakes can prove to be expensive. For instance, I often see consumers who just don’t want to put in the time and effort necessary to learn about long-term care insurance choices. As a result, they will often take the first policy offered to them without really shopping around. They may put in an application with the first insurance agent who contacts them even if that agent only represents one company.

This is rarely a good decision as premiums can vary considerably from one company to another depending on the consumer’s age, health, and coverage needs. Without making a comparison between the top carriers in the long-term care insurance field, there is no way of knowing whether you have gotten the best deal possible.

However, the single most common and expensive mistake that many consumers make with long-term care insurance is to simply procrastinate making any decision at all.

They may have heard that long-term care insurance is a good thing, and so they investigate the cost for themselves. But once they have all the facts and figures necessary to make an informed decision, they just decide to put it off for a while.

Unfortunately, deferring the decision for a year or so often turns into several years. In the meantime, the insurance premiums they were originally quoted no longer apply as this insurance gets much more expensive the longer you wait to get it.

In addition, they often develop illnesses that at the very least will lower their rate classification and make their premiums increase. In some cases, their health may even deteriorate so rapidly and unexpectedly that they are not insurable at all with any reputable carrier at any cost. They may complain about the insurance companies but the fault is not with the carriers. What they have done is similar in nature to waiting to purchase homeowners insurance until their house is on fire. It’s just not a wise thing to do.

I often see folks who have procrastinated for quite some time about purchasing long-term care insurance who can now no longer afford the premiums because they waited too long or who may never be able to get the insurance again because of serious health issues that have suddenly arisen.

So, of all the mistakes that can be made when considering long-term care insurance, there is one that is by far the most common and expensive in my opinion: procrastination.

1 in 8 Americans Expected to Develop Alzheimer’s

One of the furure possibilities that worries many people I talk to each day is the prospect of developing Alzheimer’s and requiring expensive long-term care as a result.

Unfortunately, the latest news on the trends for this disease are pointing to a substantial increase in the numbers of people who will have Alzheimer’s in their lifetime. Here is an article from the Washington Post that releases the latest data from the Alzheimer’s Association:

“An estimated 10 million American baby boomers will develop Alzheimer’s disease in their lifetime, placing enormous strains on the U.S. health-care system and the already overburdened network of caregivers, a new report predicts.

Currently, at least 5.2 million Americans suffer from Alzheimer’s, including 200,000 to 250,000 people under age 65. By 2010, projections say there will be 500,000 new cases of the mind-wasting disease each year, and nearly one million new cases annually by 2050, the report estimates.

In addition, the report, released Tuesday by the Alzheimer’s Association, showed that the disease is now the seventh deadliest in the nation and that women are at greater risk than men.

The overall prediction for 10 million, which translates to 1 out of every 8 boomers, is a number that is “particularly significant because it’s people who are now just approaching what we refer to as the age of highest risk,” said Stephen McConnell, the association’s vice president for advocacy and public policy.

The age of highest risk for Alzheimer’s starts at 65, McConnell said. “Some of these people are already developing the disease, and those numbers are just going to increase dramatically over the next several decades,” he added.

This is going to have a huge impact on baby boomers’ lives, their families, and the nation’s health-care system, McConnell said.

Right now, there are 10 million caregivers providing care, many of them family members, at enormous personal cost, McConnell noted. “These caregivers tend to be spouses, but there’s evidence that 250,000 of these caregivers are children 8 to 18,” he said. “So you get the sense of an expanded circle of people who are affected by this disease. It’s not just the person with the disease. It’s not just their immediate caregiver — it’s the children and grandchildren.”

Most people with Alzheimer’s are eligible for Medicare, so a burgeoning number of Alzheimer’s patients will put a major strain on the federal health insurance program, McConnell pointed out.

Medicare currently spends more than three times as much money on people with Alzheimer’s and other dementias than it does for the average Medicare recipient. In 2005, Medicare spent $91 billion on people with Alzheimer’s and other dementias. By 2010, that number is expected to climb to $160 billion, and by 2015, to $189 billion annually, according to the report.

These high Medicare costs occur because Alzheimer’s tends to complicate the treatment of other medical conditions such as diabetes and heart disease, McConnell said. Also, while people with Alzheimer’s live an average of eight years, they can live more than 20 years, placing an additional strain on the health-care system.”……you can read more of this article here.